Comparing wound complication rates following closure of hip wounds with metallic skin staples or subcuticular vicryl suture: A prospective randomised trial

AA Shetty, VS Kumar, C Morgan-Hough, GA Georgeu, KD James, JE Nicholl
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Kent and Sussex Hospital, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, United Kingdom

PURPOSE. To compare 2 methods of wound closure—metallic staples or 3-0 undyed vicryl—according to postoperative wound complication rates.

METHODS. Patients who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fractures were randomised to have wound closure with metallic staples or with subcuticular vicryl suture. Wounds were regularly examined postoperatively and only those with positive wound swabs were regarded as wound infections.

RESULTS. Five infections and one superficial wound dehiscence occurred in the patients who had wound closure with metallic staples. The complication rate was significantly higher for this group compared with the group who had wound closure with subcuticular vicryl suture (p<0.025).

CONCLUSION. Superficial wound complication rates are higher for wounds closed with metallic staples compared to wounds closed with subcuticular vicryl.

 
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 2004;12(2):191-193
download article in PDF format
view this abstract on MedLine

get Adobe Acrobat Reader

Last update: 25 December 2004